Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What are *you* thinking?  Yes, that patch has that line, but
> log_statement and log_min_duration_statement is going to trigger
> log_min_error_statement so you are going to get the statement printed
> twice.

What's wrong with that?  If a statement triggers two different log
entries, and both are subject to being annotated with the statement text
according to log_min_error_statement, I would expect them both to be
annotated.  Doing otherwise will probably break automated log analysis

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to