"Peter Eisentraut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Joachim Wieland wrote: >> Attached is the long-awaited guc patch that makes values fall back to >> their default values when they got removed (or commented) from the >> configuration file. This has always been a source of confusion. > > I have applied your patch with some of the discussed corrections. The > use of memory allocation in the GUC code might still need some review.
This is a pretty major user-visible change. While I'm strongly in favour of it it seems like there ought to be some documentation file touched by this, no? Or have I missed it? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
