"Peter Eisentraut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Joachim Wieland wrote:
>> Attached is the long-awaited guc patch that makes values fall back to
>> their default values when they got removed (or commented) from the
>> configuration file. This has always been a source of confusion.
> I have applied your patch with some of the discussed corrections.  The 
> use of memory allocation in the GUC code might still need some review.

This is a pretty major user-visible change. While I'm strongly in favour of it
it seems like there ought to be some documentation file touched by this, no?
Or have I missed it?

  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to