Joachim Wieland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:19:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, they *are* strings as long as they're "custom". Once a
>> DefineCustomFoo has been executed, there (should be) no difference
>> between a "custom" variable and a hard-wired one.
> The code in question is the only place that calls one of the
> DefineCustom*Variable functions. But those functions set
> var->group = CUSTOM_OPTIONS what makes variables look like custom variables
> defined via SQL or the config file but in reality they aren't. Hence the
> confusion of the type assertion.
My point here that you shouldn't be using var->group to make any
semantic choices. That's supposed to be a label for user convenience,
nothing else.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
