Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Uh, no, that's not very clear.  A long-running transaction will be a
>> VACUUM bottleneck because of its own XID, never mind its xmin.

> Well, my secondary addition was to start MyProc->xmin with the current
> xid counter, rather than your own xid.

Don't tell me you seriously believe that would work.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to