Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Uh, no, that's not very clear. A long-running transaction will be a >> VACUUM bottleneck because of its own XID, never mind its xmin.
> Well, my secondary addition was to start MyProc->xmin with the current > xid counter, rather than your own xid. Don't tell me you seriously believe that would work. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq