Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Uh, no, that's not very clear.  A long-running transaction will be a
> >> VACUUM bottleneck because of its own XID, never mind its xmin.
> > Well, my secondary addition was to start MyProc->xmin with the current
> > xid counter, rather than your own xid.
> Don't tell me you seriously believe that would work.

I do.  Please tell me why it will not.

  Bruce Momjian  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to