ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I manually merged your patch on top of my own. This is the result. > > > > Please have a look at whether the new code is correct and behaves sanely > > > > (I haven't tested it). > > > > Huh, you are right, it is broken, even in my outgoing mailbox -- I don't > > know what happened, as the file I have on disk is complete. Here is > > attached again. > > I tested your patch on Linux and Windows. It works well on Linux, > where we use fork(), but falls into segfault on Windows, where we > use exec(). Maybe you forgot to initialize the shared memory stuff. > (I haven't find out where to be fixed, sorry.)
Ok, thanks, this confirms that I have to try the EXEC_BACKEND code path. > Multiworker and balancing seem to work well after they successfully start up. Great. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
