On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 02:39:45PM +0100, Gregory Stark wrote: > "Jim Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I don't see how we could make the names shorter without moving > > away from a backslash command (which I'm guessing would be > > painful). > > > > Assuming we're stuck with a backslash command \cs[witch] and \cn > > [owait] seem to be about as good as we could get. > > I don't have \cs or \cn set up as abbreviations. > > I was originally thinking \c1, \c2, ... for \cswitch and \c& for > \cnowait. I'm not sure if going for cryptic short commands is better > or worse here.
+1 for \c1, \c2, etc. What's the reasoning behind \c&? Does it "send things into the background" the way & does in the shell? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote! Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
