Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But why are we doing that CHAREQ?
To avoid the cost of the recursive call, just like it says. > If it succeeds we'll > just do it again when we recurse, I think. If you move the other two cases then you could advance t and p before entering the recursion. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly