Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But why are we doing that CHAREQ?

To avoid the cost of the recursive call, just like it says.

> If it succeeds we'll 
> just do it again when we recurse, I think.

If you move the other two cases then you could advance t and p before
entering the recursion.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to