On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:17:30AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I'm wondering why the back-branch patches added a dependency on > DTK_ISODOW in the first place. That looks more like a copy&paste > error than something intentional. Michael?
Advertising
It is, somehow it slipped through. Just removed it. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
