Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's a new version, all known issues are now fixed. I'm now happy with 
> this patch.
> Next, I'll start looking at the latest version of Jeff's synchronized 
> scans patch.

I'm a bit confused --- weren't you intending to review these in parallel
because of the possible interactions?  Do you think this should be
applied now, or does it need to wait to see what happens with Jeff's
patch?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to