Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Here's a new version, all known issues are now fixed. I'm now happy with this patch. Next, I'll start looking at the latest version of Jeff's synchronized scans patch.

I'm a bit confused --- weren't you intending to review these in parallel
because of the possible interactions?  Do you think this should be
applied now, or does it need to wait to see what happens with Jeff's

I think it should be applied now. I've briefly looked at Jeff's patch and I don't see any problems looming there.

Jeff performed tests with Simon's original patch and his patch, and I think the results from those tests are still valid since the basic behavior hasn't been changed. I'll repeat those tests myself, and run some more to see if the added CPU overhead shows up in tests, but I'm pretty confident the patches will work together as advertised.

  Heikki Linnakangas

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to