On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 11:40:52AM +0100, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >But we've got plenty of both in the buildfarm, and none of them are
> >showing this failure. So I'm curious to know what's really different
> >about Joachim's installation. It seems he must have a pg_constraint
> >table enough larger than "normal" to discourage the seqscan, but where
> >did that come from? There's only one row in pg_constraint in standard
> >template0 --- could he be working with a custom system that has many
> >more?
> Or maybe some non-default values in postgresql.conf? Like random_page_cost?
No, I use what initdb creates:
$ cat postgresql.conf | grep ^[a-zA-Z]
max_connections = 100 # (change requires restart)
shared_buffers = 24MB # min 128kB or max_connections*16kB
max_fsm_pages = 153600 # min max_fsm_relations*16, 6 bytes each
datestyle = 'iso, dmy'
lc_messages = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' # locale for system
error message
lc_monetary = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' # locale for monetary
formatting
lc_numeric = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' # locale for number
formatting
lc_time = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' # locale for time
formatting
Joachim
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
