Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > This has been saved for the 8.4 release: > > I think it should be dropped entirely. The argument against was that > it complicated the code in a non-performance-critical path, and that > argument isn't going to be different next time.
Advertising
I only kept it for 8.4 because I was worried it might be needed for HOT performance. Are we sure that is not the case because that is why it was originally proposed. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
