Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This has been saved for the 8.4 release:
> 
> I think it should be dropped entirely.  The argument against was that
> it complicated the code in a non-performance-critical path, and that
> argument isn't going to be different next time.

I only kept it for 8.4 because I was worried it might be needed for HOT
performance.  Are we sure that is not the case because that is why it
was originally proposed.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to