On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 11:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > checkpoint_maxpages would seem like a better name; we've already had > > those _maxpages settings for 3 releases, so changing that is not really > > an option (at so late a stage). > > Sure it is.
Maybe, but we need a proposal before we agree to change anything. If we can get rid of them, good, but if we can't I'd like to see a clear posting of the parameters, their meaning and suggested names before we commit this, please. BTW, checkpoint_write_percent actually does what I wanted, but I wasn't able to guess that from the name. checkpoint_duration_percent? -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
