"Pavan Deolasee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please see the revised patches attached.
I'm curious how much the WAL-recovery aspects of this patch have been tested, because heap_xlog_clean seems quite broken. You have apparently decided to redefine the WAL record format as using one-based rather than zero-based item offsets, which would be fine if any of the rest of the code had been changed to agree ... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org