On 9/13/07, Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, I just checked the work-in-progress patch I sent you back in July.
> I refactored it to use one-based offsets for consistency, since I
> modified log_heap_clean quite heavily anyway.
> It's possible that I broke it in the process, I was only interested in
> testing the performance characteristics of the simplified pruning scheme.
I don't think so -- atleast I couldn't figure out why its broken. But I
would take Tom's comment seriously and look more into it tomorrow.
Or we can just revert it back to zero-based offsets.