OK, moved to patches list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Gregory Stark wrote: > > Do we have anyone actively maintaining pltcl these days? I'm intentionally > > quite unfamiliar with Tcl or I would be happy to verify it's reasonable. But > > the explanation seems pretty convincing. If we don't have anyone maintaining > > it then we're pretty much at the mercy of applying whatever patches come in > > from people who are more familiar with it than us. In my experience that's > > how > > new maintainers for modules of free software are often found anyways. > > > > > > I was hoping that Jan or somebody else with some Tcl-fu would comment. I > agree it probably shouldn't be deferred. > > It does bother me a bit that the Tcl engine startup just starts firing > up threads without advertisement - I wondered if we shouldn't kick back > and say it's their problem to fix. > > cheers > > andrew -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
