On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 10:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 14:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Hmm, not right there, because we don't know that the file actually > >> exists yet. Applied with modifications ... > > > Double hmmm, that means when we are waiting for file X in pg_standby the > > ps display will still show "recovering X-1". I'd prefer to set ps before > > the call to RestoreArchivedFile(), since that is where the wait occurs. > > I got that wrong myself. > > Well, if you think that's an important time component --- which it could > be in archive situations, I guess --- there should be a separate PS > display state for it.
Agreed. I think it will save time answering questions on -admin later. > Perhaps "fetching XXX" vs "restoring XXX"? Restoring is the right term, I think. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
