Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 11:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I like "fetching" or "retrieving" for
>> the activity of getting a WAL segment from an archive, because in cases
>> where the activity takes long enough to be noticeable, it's probably
>> because you are physically getting the file from someplace else.

> "Waiting for" sounds best I think. It might be waiting for a manual tape
> mount for example, not just a warm standby. If the wait isn't very long
> it won't hardly notice anyway.

Hmm ... I guess that's OK, because after all we *are* waiting for the
restore_command to do something.  Will make it so.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to