Brendan Jurd wrote: > On 9/29/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think we need more than one person's request to add this function. > > Well, I don't expect it would get requested. Most DBAs would likely > look for the function in the docs, see it's not there and then just > implement it themselves. Obviously it's not critical. But > anticipating those little requirements and providing for them is one > of the things that makes a piece of software a pleasure to use. > "Batteries included" and all that.
I was just looking for someone else to say "Yea, I would like that too". > Anyway, I seem to be flogging a horse which, if not dead, is surely > mortally wounded. If quote_qualified_ident isn't desired, perhaps you > can still use the regression test I included for quote_ident in the > patch. The test is functional as a standalone item, and seems to fill > a gap. Well, we don't test everything and I don't remember problems in quoting in the past, at least not enough to add another test. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
