-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:08:29 +0000 Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > >> A trigger will probably beat a rule for inserts/updates involving > >> a small number of rows. > > > > Which is exactly what partitioning is doing. > > Say what? Heh, o.k. that was an ambiguous sentence. In a partitioned environment you are likely not moving millions of rows around. Thus the "rule" benefit is lost. You are instead performing many (sometimes lots-o-many) inserts and updates that involve a small number of rows. A trigger/function as Tom already pointed out is going to perform better than a rule in that case. The benefit becomes even more pronounce the more partitions you have. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHTvNXATb/zqfZUUQRAqeJAJ9CoO6F4zYJwY4geAR1UsvVCYqagwCdFJm9 63GRksppATp7fK9qu2RYXD0= =VuWy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match