"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rules are extremely slow in comparisons and not anywhere near as 
> flexible. As I said up post yesterday... they work well in the basic 
> partitioning configuration but anything else they are extremely deficient.

I think that the above claim is exceedingly narrow-minded.  A trigger
will probably beat a rule for inserts/updates involving a small number
of rows.  For large numbers of rows, like an INSERT/SELECT from another
large table, the rule is likely to win, because its overhead is paid
once per query not once per row.  Also, if you implement the trigger
with an EXECUTE (forcing a planning cycle) intead of hard-coded
commands, the speed advantage becomes even more dubious.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to