Zdenek Kotala wrote: > If I looked correctly there is no getopt_long. There is only getopt with > - as a option. See PostmasterMain: > > > while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, > "A:B:c:D:d:EeFf:h:ijk:lN:nOo:Pp:r:S:sTt:W:-:")) != -1) > > If I understand correctly the POSIX standard "-" should not used in a > option list.
Hmm, right. Our current parsing of --long-opts is quite a hack, it seems :-( Having to list all GUC options in the getopt_long array would be a mess. Any other ideas? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
