Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Is there any currently supported platform which
>>> does not have uint64?
>>
>> I don't know, and neither do you.
> Maybe we should look at some reasonable way of getting the info out of a
> compiled instance. How about if we get pg_config to output the value of
> INT64_IS_BUSTED?
We know all the buildfarm machines have working int64, because they'd
fail the bigint regression test if not. That's not the point here.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
