On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:50:11AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >>> Is there any currently supported platform which does not have > >>> uint64? > >> > >> I don't know, and neither do you. > > > Maybe we should look at some reasonable way of getting the info > > out of a compiled instance. How about if we get pg_config to > > output the value of INT64_IS_BUSTED? > > We know all the buildfarm machines have working int64, because > they'd fail the bigint regression test if not. That's not the point > here.
If we don't have buildfarm coverage for machines where INT64_IS_BUSTED, how do we know we support those architectures at all? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
