On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:50:11AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> Is there any currently supported platform which does not have
> >>> uint64?
> >>
> >> I don't know, and neither do you.
> > Maybe we should look at some reasonable way of getting the info
> > out of a compiled instance. How about if we get pg_config to
> > output the value of INT64_IS_BUSTED?
> We know all the buildfarm machines have working int64, because
> they'd fail the bigint regression test if not.  That's not the point
> here.

If we don't have buildfarm coverage for machines where INT64_IS_BUSTED,
how do we know we support those architectures at all?

David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to