Robert Lor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I haven't heard any major disadvantages about keeping it in c.h, but if > you are still adamant about keeping it out of c.h, I'll will go along > with that.
I was thinking that pg_trace.h involved some backend-only code, but I'm not sure why I thought that :-(. Yeah, your plan to do it by restructuring the contents of pg_trace.h sounds fine. We still have what I consider a big problem with the names of the macros. Perhaps that could be fixed by passing the auto-generated file through a sed script to put a prefix on the macro names before we start to use it? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org