Robert Lor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I haven't heard any major disadvantages about keeping it in c.h, but if 
> you are still adamant about keeping it out of c.h, I'll will go along 
> with that.

I was thinking that pg_trace.h involved some backend-only code, but
I'm not sure why I thought that :-(.  Yeah, your plan to do it by
restructuring the contents of pg_trace.h sounds fine.

We still have what I consider a big problem with the names of the
macros.  Perhaps that could be fixed by passing the auto-generated
file through a sed script to put a prefix on the macro names before
we start to use it?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to