"Brendan Jurd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I read Greg's latter proposal correctly, he was suggesting

> \df Lists all user functions
> \df [pattern] Lists both system and user functions matching [pattern]
> \df * Lists all system and user functions

Hmm, I must've misread it, because I didn't understand it quite like
that.  That seems like a nice simple minimal-featuritis approach.

One question: should \df really list *all* nonsystem functions?  Or just
the ones that are visible in your search path?  I'd be inclined to say
the second.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to