"Brendan Jurd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If I read Greg's latter proposal correctly, he was suggesting
> \df Lists all user functions > \df [pattern] Lists both system and user functions matching [pattern] > \df * Lists all system and user functions Hmm, I must've misread it, because I didn't understand it quite like that. That seems like a nice simple minimal-featuritis approach. One question: should \df really list *all* nonsystem functions? Or just the ones that are visible in your search path? I'd be inclined to say the second. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches