"Brendan Jurd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I read Greg's latter proposal correctly, he was suggesting
> \df Lists all user functions
> \df [pattern] Lists both system and user functions matching [pattern]
> \df * Lists all system and user functions
Hmm, I must've misread it, because I didn't understand it quite like
that. That seems like a nice simple minimal-featuritis approach.
One question: should \df really list *all* nonsystem functions? Or just
the ones that are visible in your search path? I'd be inclined to say
the second.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
