"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Brendan Jurd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> If I read Greg's latter proposal correctly, he was suggesting > >> \df Lists all user functions >> \df [pattern] Lists both system and user functions matching [pattern] >> \df * Lists all system and user functions > > Hmm, I must've misread it, because I didn't understand it quite like > that. That seems like a nice simple minimal-featuritis approach.
Sorry if was confusing but yes, that is what I intended by my second proposal. I prefer it to my own first proposal or any of the others. I admit I was thinking primarily of non-globbing cases for pattern. As in, I would want \df rtrim to "work". I suppose it could be annoying to have to type \df public.* -- there's nothing stopping us from having \dfU and \dfS too I suppose, though I doubt most people would find them. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services! -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches