"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Added to TODO:
>> o Add ability to obfuscate function bodies
> For the record. I think this todo is bogus.
For the record, I think so too ;-). The agreed-on TODO wording makes no
mention of what an acceptable implementation would look like, and that's
because there very possibly *is* no generally-acceptable implementation.
(Though if someone has a bright new idea, I'm sure we'd all listen.)
The point of the TODO entry is just to acknowledge that this is an issue
for some folk, and that a real solution would be welcomed.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
