"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Added to TODO:
>> o Add ability to obfuscate function bodies

> For the record. I think this todo is bogus.

For the record, I think so too ;-).  The agreed-on TODO wording makes no
mention of what an acceptable implementation would look like, and that's
because there very possibly *is* no generally-acceptable implementation.
(Though if someone has a bright new idea, I'm sure we'd all listen.)
The point of the TODO entry is just to acknowledge that this is an issue
for some folk, and that a real solution would be welcomed.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to