Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Added to TODO: > >> o Add ability to obfuscate function bodies > > > For the record. I think this todo is bogus. > > For the record, I think so too ;-). The agreed-on TODO wording makes no > mention of what an acceptable implementation would look like, and that's > because there very possibly *is* no generally-acceptable implementation. > (Though if someone has a bright new idea, I'm sure we'd all listen.) > The point of the TODO entry is just to acknowledge that this is an issue > for some folk, and that a real solution would be welcomed.
We could list it as a feature we don't want, but I don't think that is accurate. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
