"Alvaro Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Bryce Nesbitt wrote: >> > Bruce Momjian wrote: >> > > I have updated the documentation for this patch. I consider it ready to >> > > apply. I think it is as close to a middle ground as we are going to >> > > get. Further adjustment will have to happen when we have more reports >> > > from the field. >> > >> > I heard a pretty compelling argument to make "wrapped" part of "aligned", >> > and thus I think the patch is ready to go only after adjusting the >> > user-facing syntax: > > I think this is what makes the most sense of what I've seen so far. > Wrapped is a special case of aligned anyway (there's no "wrapped > unaligned" or "wrapped HTML" for example, nor would we want there to > be.)
Well there's no unaligned HTML or aligned unaligned either... > I think that could be fixed easily by having the syntax be something > like > > \pset format aligned:80 > \pset format aligned:autowrap I suppose. It seems kind of inconvenient though, what advantage does it have? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services! -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
