"Alvaro Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > > I have updated the documentation for this patch.  I consider it ready to
>> > > apply.  I think it is as close to a middle ground as we are going to
>> > > get.  Further adjustment will have to happen when we have more reports
>> > > from the field.
>> >
>> > I heard a pretty compelling argument to make "wrapped" part of "aligned",
>> > and thus I think the patch  is ready to go only after adjusting the
>> > user-facing syntax:
> I think this is what makes the most sense of what I've seen so far.
> Wrapped is a special case of aligned anyway (there's no "wrapped
> unaligned" or "wrapped HTML" for example, nor would we want there to
> be.)

Well there's no unaligned HTML or aligned unaligned either...

> I think that could be fixed easily by having the syntax be something
> like
> \pset format aligned:80
> \pset format aligned:autowrap

I suppose. It seems kind of inconvenient though, what advantage does it have?

  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com
  Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!

Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to