On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 21:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ugh. The fact that the RESTART IDENTITY part of TRUNCATE is > > non-transactional is a pretty unsightly wort. > > Actually, I agree. Shall we just revert that feature? The ALTER > SEQUENCE part of this patch is clean and useful, but I'm less than > enamored of the TRUNCATE part.
Perhaps, but we should also take into account that TRUNCATE is not and never will be MVCC compliant, so its not something you'd expect to run except as a maintenance action. If we do keep it, I would suggest that we add a WARNING so that the effects are clearly recorded. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
