Davy Durham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So, if this patch is not acceptable as-is, what would you feel about > this: > I could enhance the -t/--table=NAME option to accept more than a > simple NAME. Rather it could accept something in the form: > --table=<table_name>:<where-clause expression>
Well, that would at least address the complaint that it doesn't scale to multiple tables, but the whole thing still seems like a frammish that will never see enough use to justify maintaining it. (BTW, what will you do with a table whose name contains a colon?) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches