Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 13:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm, I dunno, it seems like that might be a bad choice.  Are you sure
>> it's not cleaner to just use the regular checkpoint code?

> When I tried to write it, it just looked to my eyes like every single
> line had a caveat which looked ugly and multiplied the testing. You're
> the code dude, always happy to structure things as you suggest. If
> you're sure, that is.

No, was just wondering if the other way would be better.  If you're
sure not, that's fine.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to