[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Nagler) writes:
> I've read some posts that says vacuum doesn't lock, but my experience
> today indicates the opposite. It seemed that "vacuum full analyze"
> was locked waiting and so were other postmaster processes. It
> appeared to be deadlock, because all were in "WAITING" state according
> to ps. I let this go for about a 1/2 hour, and then killed the vacuum
> at which point all other processes completed normally.
VACUUM FULL certainly does lock.
See the man page:
INPUTS
FULL Selects ``full'' vacuum, which may reclaim more space, but takes
much longer and exclusively locks the table.
The usual answer is that you probably _didn't_ want to VACUUM FULL.
VACUUM ('no full') does NOT block updates.
> The same thing seemed to be happening with reindex on a table. It
> seems that the reindex locks the table and some other resource which
> then causes deadlock with other active processes.
Not surprising either. While the reindex takes place, updates to that
table have to be deferred.
> Another issue seems to be performance. A reindex on some indexes is
> taking 12 minutes or so. Vacuum seems to be slow, too. Way longer
> than the time it takes to reimport the entire database (30 mins).
That seems a little surprising.
> In summary, I suspect that it is better from a UI perspective to
> bring down the app on Sat at 3 a.m and reimport with a fixed time
> period than to live through reindexing/vacuuming which may deadlock.
> Am I missing something?
Consider running pg_autovacuum, and thereby do a little bit of
vacuuming here and there all the time. It DOESN'T block, so unless
your system is really busy, it shouldn't slow things down to a major
degree.
--
"cbbrowne","@","libertyrms.info"
<http://dev6.int.libertyrms.com/>
Christopher Browne
(416) 646 3304 x124 (land)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
