On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 11:46, Jeff wrote:
> Yeah - like I expected it was able to generate much better code for
> _bt_checkkeys which was the #1 function in gcc on both sun & linux.
> and as you can see, suncc was just able to generate much nicer code.

What CFLAGS does configure pick for gcc? From
src/backend/template/solaris, I'd guess it's not enabling any
optimization. Is that the case? If so, some gcc numbers with -O and -O2
would be useful.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to