On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 11:46, Jeff wrote: > Yeah - like I expected it was able to generate much better code for > _bt_checkkeys which was the #1 function in gcc on both sun & linux. > > and as you can see, suncc was just able to generate much nicer code.
What CFLAGS does configure pick for gcc? From src/backend/template/solaris, I'd guess it's not enabling any optimization. Is that the case? If so, some gcc numbers with -O and -O2 would be useful. -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
