Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:27:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> trace.  What is causing that?  Not VACUUM I don't think.  It doesn't have
>> any huge memory demand.  But swapping out processes could account for

> What about if you've set vacuum_mem too high?

Maybe, but only if it actually had reason to use a ton of memory ---
that is, it were recycling a very large number of tuples in a single
table.  IIRC that didn't seem to be the case here.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to