On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 10:18:35AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > Not I. We have had issues with JFS and data corruption on a powerout but > XFS has been rock solid in all of our tests.
Sorry, it was Josh Berkus: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2004-01/msg00086.php > There is nothing else on Linux that comes close to that. Plus XFS has been > proven in a 64 bit environment (Irix). I had lots of happy experiences with XFS when administering IRIX boxes[1], but I don't know what differences the Linux port entailed. Do you have details on that? We're certainly looking for an option over JFS at the moment. A [1] I will note, however, that it was practically the only happy experience I had with them. IRIX made the early Debian installer look positively user-friendly, and SGI's desire to make everything whiz-bang nifty by running practically every binary setuid root gave me fits. But XFS was nice. -- Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant- garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism. --Brad Holland ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
