Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I've got a quad 2.8Ghz MP Xeon (IBM x445) that I could test on. Does
>> anyone have a test set that can reliably reproduce the problem?
> Unfortunately we can't seem to come up with one.
> It does seem to require a database which is in the many GB (> 10GB), and a
> situation where a small subset of the data is getting hit repeatedly by
> multiple processes.
I do not think a large database is actually necessary; the test case
Josh's client has is only hitting a relatively small amount of data.
The trick seems to be to cause lots and lots of ReadBuffer/ReleaseBuffer
activity without much else happening, and to do this from multiple
backends concurrently.
I believe the best way to make this happen is a lot of relatively simple
(but not short) indexscan queries that in aggregate touch just a bit
less than shared_buffers worth of data. I have not tried to make a
self-contained test case, but based on what I know now I think it should
be possible.
I'll give this a shot later tonight --- it does seem that trying to
reproduce the problem on different kinds of hardware is the next useful
step we can take.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
