Don't think so, mine is a vanilla kernel from kernel.org

Dave
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 16:03, Dirk Lutzebaeck wrote:
> Could this be related to the O(1) scheduler backpatches from 2.6 to 2.4 
> kernel on newer 2.4er distros (RedHat, SuSE)?
> 
> 
> Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> >Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >  
> >
> >>>Improve spinlock code for recent x86 processors: insert a PAUSE
> >>>instruction in the s_lock() wait loop, and use test before test-and-set
> >>>in TAS() macro to avoid unnecessary bus traffic.  Patch from Manfred
> >>>Spraul, reworked a bit by Tom.
> >>>      
> >>>
> >
> >  
> >
> >>I thought this had been committed to the 7.4 stable branch as well, but 
> >>it appears not.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >I am currently chasing what seems to be the same issue: massive context
> >swapping on a dual Xeon system.  I tried back-patching the above-mentioned
> >patch ... it helps a little but by no means solves the problem ...
> >
> >                     regards, tom lane
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> 
> 
> 
> !DSPAM:408535ce93801252113544!
> 
> 
-- 
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 14675561


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to