=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Josu=E9_Maldonado?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Recreated the index (drop then create) and did the vacuum full pkardex 
> and the behavior seems to be the same:

Well, there was a pretty huge improvement in the pkardex scan time,
whether you noticed it or not: 39520.406 to 87.393 msec.  This
definitely suggests that you've been lax about vacuuming this table.

I'm wondering whether pmdoc might not be overdue for vacuuming as

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to