Actually you are both are right and wrong. The XRaid uses FibreChannel
to communicate to the host machine(s). The Raid controller is a
FibreChannel controller. After that there is a FibreChannel to
UltraATA conversion for each drive, separate ATA bus for each drive. What I am curious about is if this setup gets around ATA fsync problems, where the drive reports the write before it is actually performed. Josh Berkus wrote: Guys,the XServe/XRaid comes with FibreChannelI stand corrected. That should help things some; it makes it more of a small tradeoff between performance and storage size for the drives. -- Kevin Barnard Speed Fulfillment and Call Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] 214-258-0120 |
- [PERFORM] Anyone familiar with Apple Xserve RAID Robert Treat
- Re: [PERFORM] Anyone familiar with Apple Xserve RAID Josh Berkus
- Re: [PERFORM] Anyone familiar with Apple Xserve R... Doug McNaught
- Re: [PERFORM] Anyone familiar with Apple Xser... Andrew Rawnsley
- Re: [PERFORM] Anyone familiar with Apple ... Tore Halset
- Re: [PERFORM] Anyone familiar with A... Andrew Rawnsley
- Re: [PERFORM] Anyone familiar with Apple Xserve R... Ralf Schramm
- Re: [PERFORM] Anyone familiar with Apple Xser... Josh Berkus
- Re: [PERFORM] Anyone familiar with Apple ... Kevin Barnard
- Re: [PERFORM] Anyone familiar with A... Doug McNaught
- Re: [PERFORM] Anyone familiar wi... Alan Stange
- Re: [PERFORM] Anyone familiar wi... Andrew Rawnsley
- Re: [PERFORM] Anyone familiar with Apple ... Vivek Khera
- Re: [PERFORM] Anyone familiar with Apple Xserve RAID Ralf Schramm