Merlin Moncure schrieb:
Following is the promised writeup in performance related issues
comparing win32 with linux x86 and linux x86-64. Unfortunately, the 64
bit portion of the test is not yet completed and won't be for a bit.
However there are some telling things about the win32/linux comparison.
If you are considering deploying postgres in a win32 environment read
First a description of the client app:
Our company develops an ERP/CRM written in cobol which we are porting to
run on PostgreSQL. Part of this porting effort was development of an
ISAM 'driver' for our app to allow it to store/fetch data from the
database in place of a traditional file system, which is complete.

For those of you unfamiliar with COBOL/ISAM, applications written with
it have a 'one record at a time' mentality, such the application tends
to spam the server with queries of the select * from t where k = k1
variety.  Our driver creates stored procedures as necessary and uses
ExecParams wherever possible to cut down on server CPU time, which is a
precious resource in our case.  Over time we plan to gradually redeploy
our application logic to make better use of the sql server's server side
power.  Our application is very rarely i/o bound because we will make
sure our server has enough memory so that the data will be rarely, if
ever, *not* run from the cache.

A good benchmark of our application performance is the time it takes to
read the entire bill of materials for a product.  This is a recursive
read of about 2500 records in the typical case (2408 in the test case).

I always knew that COBOL ultimativly looses, but it's always refreshing to get confirmation from time to time :)

Test platform:
Pentium 4 3.06 GHz/HT
10k SATA Raptor
1Gb memory
Windows XP Pro SP2/Redhat Fedora 3 (64 bit results coming soon)

BOM traversal for product ***** (1 user): win32: runtime: 3.34 sec avg cpu load: 60%
redhat: runtime: 3.46 sec avg cpu load: 20%

Where did you get the win32 "avg cpu load" number from? AFAIK there's no getloadavg() for windows. At least I tried hard to find one, because I want to add a comparable figure to cygwin core. emacs, coreutils, make and others would need desperately need it, not to speak of servers and real-time apps.
Did you read it from taskman, or did you come up with your self-written solution? In taskman there's afaik no comparable figure. But there should be some perfmon api, which would do the trick.


"The load average (LA) is the average number of processes (the sum of the run queue length and the number of jobs currently running) that are ready to run, but are waiting for access to a busy CPU."

And thanks for the overview!
Reini Urban

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to