Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 10:17 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Other than spec compliance, you mean? SQL99 says >>> >>> ... The declared type of each referencing column shall be >>> comparable to the declared type of the corresponding referenced >>> column.
> Tom had said SQL99 required this; I have pointed out SQL:2003, which > supercedes the SQL99 standard, does not require this. You're reading the wrong part of SQL:2003. 11.8 <referential constraint definition> syntax rule 9 still has the text I quoted. > Leading us back to my original point - what is the benefit of continuing > with having a WARNING when that leads people into trouble later? Accepting spec-compliant schemas. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings