* Marc Mamin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I've just made a first test wich resulted in a query being 15KB big annd
> containing 63 UNION.

If the data is distinct from each other or you don't mind duplicate
records you might try using 'union all' instead of 'union'.  Just a
thought.

        Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to