Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
>work_mem = 102400

>...I tried tweaking cpu_*, work_mem, effective_cache and so on, but without
>any luck.

I'm hoping you didn't tweak it enough!  I posted something similar
this a while ago, but haven't since got around to figuring out
a useful test case to send to the list.

Try reducing your work_mem down to 1000 or so and things should
start doing what you expect.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to