Thanks, everyone. I got some excellent replies, including some long
explanations. Appreciate the time you guys took out for the responses.
The gist of it i take, is to use RAID10. I have 400MB+ of write cache on the
controller(s), that the RAID5 LUN(s) could benefit from by filling it up and
writing out the complete stripe, but come to think of it, it's shared among the
two Storage Processors, all the LUNs, not just the ones holding the pg_xlog
directory. The other thing (with Clariion) is the write cache mirroring. Write
isn't signalled complete to the host until the cache content is mirrored across
the other SP (and vice-versa), which is a good thing, but this operation could
potentially become a bottleneck with very high load on the SPs.
Also, one would have to fully trust the controller/manufacturer's claim on
signalling the write completion. And, performance is a priority over the drive
space lost in RAID10 for me.
I can use 4 drives instead of 6.
Thanks,
Anjan
t-----Original Message-----
From: Gregory S. Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 8/16/2005 6:22 PM
To: Anjan Dave; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc:
Subject: RE: [PERFORM] choosing RAID level for xlogs
I would be very cautious about ever using RAID5, despite manufacturers'
claims to the contrary. The link below is authored by a very knowledgable
fellow whose posts I know (and trust) from Informix land.
<http://www.miracleas.com/BAARF/RAID5_versus_RAID10.txt>
Greg Williamson
DBA
GlobeXplorer LLC
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Anjan Dave
Sent: Mon 8/15/2005 1:35 PM
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc:
Subject: [PERFORM] choosing RAID level for xlogs
Hi,
One simple question. For 125 or more checkpoint segments
(checkpoint_timeout is 600 seconds, shared_buffers are at 21760 or
170MB) on a very busy database, what is more suitable, a separate 6
disk
RAID5 volume, or a RAID10 volume? Databases will be on separate
spindles. Disks are 36GB 15KRPM, 2Gb Fiber Channel. Performance is
paramount, but I don't want to use RAID0.
PG7.4.7 on RHAS 4.0
I can provide more info if needed.
Appreciate some recommendations!
Thanks,
Anjan
---
This email message and any included attachments constitute confidential
and privileged information intended exclusively for the listed
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
Vantage by immediately telephoning 215-579-8390, extension 1158. In
addition, please reply to this message confirming your receipt of the
same in error. A copy of your email reply can also be sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please do not disclose, copy, distribute or take
any action in reliance on the contents of this information. Kindly
destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. Any other use
of
this email is prohibited. Thank you for your cooperation. For more
information about Vantage, please visit our website at
http://www.vantage.com <http://www.vantage.com/> .
---
!DSPAM:4300fd35105094125621296!
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
