Ron,

I've somehow missed part of this thread, which is a shame since this is an area of primary concern for me.


Your suggested algorithm seems to be designed to relieve I/O load by making more use of the CPU. (if I followed it correctly). However, that's not PostgreSQL's problem; currently for us external sort is a *CPU-bound* operation, half of which is value comparisons. (oprofiles available if anyone cares)

So we need to look, instead, at algorithms which make better use of work_mem to lower CPU activity, possibly even at the expense of I/O.

--Josh Berkus

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to