Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thus the time decreased from 8486 seconds to 5279 seconds - which is a > nice improvement. However, that still leaves postgresql about 9 times > slower.
BTW, what data type are you sorting, exactly? If it's a string type,
what is your LC_COLLATE setting?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
