On 11/16/05, David Boreham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Spend a fortune on dual core CPUs and then buy crappy disks... I bet > >for most applications this system will be IO bound, and you will see a > >nice lot of drive failures in the first year of operation with > >consumer grade drives. > > I guess I've never bought into the vendor story that there are > two reliability grades. Why would they bother making two > different kinds of bearing, motor etc ? Seems like it's more > likely an excuse to justify higher prices. In my experience the > expensive SCSI drives I own break frequently while the cheapo > desktop drives just keep chunking along (modulo certain products > that have a specific known reliability problem). > > I'd expect that a larger number of hotter drives will give a less reliable > system than a smaller number of cooler ones.
Of all the SCSI and IDE drives I've used, and I've used a lot, there is a definite difference in quality. The SCSI drives primarily use higher quality components that are intended to last longer under 24/7 work loads. I've taken several SCSI and IDE drives apart and you can tell from the guts that the SCSI drives are built with sturdier components. I haven't gotten my hands on the Raptor line of ATA drives yet, but I've heard they share this in common with the SCSI drives - they are built with components made to be used day and night for years straight without ending. That doesn't mean they will last longer than IDE drives, that just means they've been designed to withstand higher amounts of heat and sustained activity. I've got some IDE drives that have lasted years++ and I've got some IDE drives that have lasted months. However, my SCSI drives I've had over the years all lasted longer than the server they were installed in. I will say that in the last 10 years, the MTBF of IDE/ATA drives has improved dramatically, so I regularly use them in servers, however I have also shifted my ideology so that a server should be replaced after 3 years, where before I aimed for 5. It seems to me that the least reliable components in servers these days are the fans. -- Matthew Nuzum www.bearfruit.org ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match